Skip to content
Conscious Asset
  • Consulting
    • Asset Performance Management
    • Maintenance Management
      • Maturity Assessment
      • Business Case Estimator
      • Maintenance Coaching
    • MRO Spares
      • MRO Spares White Papers
      • Supply Chain and Inventory Analysis Case Study
        • Remote Supply Chain Analysis
    • Reliability Management
      • Business Case Estimator
      • Reliability Maturity Assessment
      • Reliability Centered Maintenance – Re-Engineered RCM-R
      • Root Cause Failure Analysis
      • Reliability Analysis
        • Reliability Data Analysis Case Studies
          • Work Order Analysis – feedback meeting example
      • Pipeline and Gas Reliability
    • Special Services
      • Expert Witness
      • Finance your project
      • Staffing
    • Technology Support
  • Learning
    • Catalog
    • My account
    • Registration
  • Events
  • Information
    • Blog
      • UPTIME
      • Reliability
      • Asset Management
      • Change Management
      • Planning and Scheduling
      • Risk Management
      • Technology
      • Consulting
      • MRO
    • Books
    • Case Studies
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Partners and Affiliations
    • Clients
    • Careers – Consulting, Training, Sales
  • Contact
Conscious Asset Blog Asset Management

Myth busting 27: RCM is only for new assets

  • 2019-05-272020-06-20

Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) was developed in the airline industry to be used for developing maintenance programs for new aircraft. There’s no doubting it – originally RCM was intended for new designs and arguably where the results of failure could be catastrophic, specifically the loss of life and where costs of maintaining had grown ridiculously high. Aircraft maintenance costs had indeed grown very high by the 1960’s and 70’s before RCM came along. In fact, one of the big drivers behind RCM was cost reduction. It worked too – in both the aerospace and nuclear power industries! Safety and other benefits were there too, but they were not primary drivers. Then, as today, cost was the problem that got the attention.

Since then we’ve seen RCM evolve and add in risk based decision making (as opposed to just the original cost based criteria). That makes it more amenable to dealing with failures where risks other than spending, are at stake. Safety and environmental considerations could be taken into account and the justification for tasks can be based on risk reduction not just cost. Today it deals with both costs and risks very well. But when should it be applied?

Those of us who understand asset management concepts and life cycle costing, will know that the best opportunity to influence life cycle costs exists at the design stages. Decisions made at the earliest stages of an asset’s life cycle can have profound effect on how long the asset will last, how well it will perform, how much it will cost its owners, how much revenue it can create or service it can deliver. It follows logically that decisions made about those assets, including their reliability and maintenance features, will also have profound effect on future costs (and risks). The best time to apply RCM is indeed at the design stages.

Even without detailed design drawings, the conceptual designs can be subjected to RCM analysis and decisions made. Those decisions can influence design as well as future support and outcomes. As design details becomes better defined and refined, those decisions can become more specific – to the point of defining your future maintenance program, and some of the operator tasks. There is a terrific opportunity then to leverage that definition of what must be done, how often and by whom into a complete definition of all support resources that will be needed.

That leveraging (combined with RCM) is known in military circles as “Integrated Logistics Support”. Without it, militaries would be hard pressed to field systems and support them as successfully as they do. For the most part we don’t do that in industry and we struggle with support challenges from commissioning onwards. That’s another discussion though.

So, if RCM is best applied at the design stages (as it was designed to do), then is there value in doing it later in the life cycle of the asset? Quick answer – yes!

Indeed the potential benefit of RCM diminishes as the asset ages throughout its life cycle, but there is still value that can far exceed the costs of implementing RCM, particularly if you apply it with your most critical assets – those that generate the most value.

Without RCM, maintenance programs tend to be at least partially ineffective. System and asset performance doesn’t quite achieve what was expected and costs to maintain them can be high. Manufacturer recommended maintenance is rarely tailored to your operating needs and misses the mark. Strict adherence to those programs (usually a rarity) will result in excessive costs. Excessive reliance on shutdowns and preventive routines are usually poor matches to the assets’ needs. Of course poor maintenance work execution discipline will mean that proactive maintenance is generally not done at all, so costs are high and reliability is low.

There is a spectrum of how proactive your maintenance program can be – from zero (entirely reactive) to very high (too many overhauls, shutdowns and PMs) has quite an impact on both reliability and costs. Cost are high at both ends of the spectrum. Reliability will be low at the reactive end and disappointing at the high end. There is a point, in the middle, where the mix of preventive, predictive, detective, operator tasks and running to failure is optimal. RCM is how you determine that mix.

I’ve worked with many companies that are highly reactive. In all cases, where RCM has been applied, costs have come down and reliability improved. Maintenance costs shift from reactive work to proactive and can fall substantially as a result, eliminating the need for contractors and overtime. The big benefits arise from the improved reliability. In one plant which was struggling with periods of low demand, the increased capacity enabled them to eliminate a production shift. In most cases, where demand is high, the increased capacity translates into increased revenues and greater margins.

In the few cases where I’ve seen extremely high levels of compliance with manufacturers’ programs, I have seen costs come down and reliability improve. In one case, an electric utility, costs came down by 22%. RCM will eliminate excessive or ineffective work. It will add work that is needed. It always drives you towards that optimum point where the mix of actions and frequencies is optimized.

If you are very near the end of the asset life and disposal or permanent shutdown is looming, then I wouldn’t bother with RCM. You might as well end things as they’ve been. But seriously consider it for the replacement system if there is going to be one. Clearly, benefits diminish with the age and remaining life of the asset, but in other cases, the costs of doing RCM can be dwarfed by the benefits in cost reductions and revenue gains, both of which will be sustained year over year.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Myth busting 26: I’ve read the book, now I’m an expert!
Myth busting 28: RCM is expensive

Currency converter

Currency conversions are estimated and should be used for informational purposes only.

Newsletter Sign-Up

reCAPTCHA demo: Simple page

Follow us on Twitter

Tweets by @@ConsciousAsset

Contact Us

  • Email
    info@consciousasset.com
  • Phone
    +1-705-408-0255
  • Address
    92 Caplan Avenue, Suite 624
    Barrie, ON L4N 9J2

USA Office

  • Email
    info@consciousasset.com
  • Phone
    +1-509-838-2548
  • Address
    400 S. Jefferson, Suite 301
    Spokane, WA 99204

Experience, Insight, Honest Advice

Let's Talk

Conscious Asset

  • Email
    info@consciousasset.com
  • Phone
    +1 705 408 0255
  • Address
    92 Caplan Ave., Suite 624
    Barrie, ON Canada L4N 9J2

Newsletter

reCAPTCHA demo: Simple page

Recent Blog Posts

  • The benefits of proactive maintenance
  • Are you informed, or data distracted? You need AIM
  • Proactive maintenance is more Covid, how “covid” is yours?
  • Pay $3k to keep out of trouble, or more to get out of jail
  • How to keep the boss out of jail
  • Interview with MRO Magazine – part 2
  • Business Case Estimator Insights
  • What I’m learning about Online Training

Articles

  • Assessment 2
  • Asset Information Management 1
  • Asset Management 41
  • Blog 100
  • Business case 11
  • Change Management 23
  • Condition Monitoring 3
  • Consulting 28
  • contracting 1
  • Finance 1
  • KPIs 3
  • MRO 12
  • Outsourcing 1
  • Performance Management 12
  • Planning and Scheduling 13
  • Processes 2
  • Reliability 44
  • Risk Management 13
  • Shutdowns 1
  • Strategy 7
  • Teamwork 5
  • Technology 12
  • Training – online 9
  • UPTIME 94
Copyright 2021 | Conscious Asset
Theme by Colorlib Powered by WordPress
  • Home Page
  • Blog
  • Website Terms of Service
  • Learning
  • My account

Login

Forgot Password?

Create a new account

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.